Legal Opinion

State v. Newton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 4, 1959No. 372PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

While the record shows four assignments of error, only two are discussed in defendant’s brief. Assignments of error, under our Rules land decisions, are deemed abandoned when defendant’s brief states no reason or argument and cites no authority in support thereof. S. v. Perry, 250 N.C. 119, 132, 108 S.E. 2d 447.

Defendant assigns as error: “That the trial Court erred in that in his Charge to the Jury, he failed to declare and explain the law aris ing on the evidence in the ease and failed to apply the law to the evidence.” This assignment, and the exception on which it is basedi, is broadside…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. . RawlesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1871
  2. State v. DanielSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  3. State v. BakerSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1897
  4. State v. . HamptonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1868
  5. State v. . JeffreysSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. State v. BentonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. State v. StarrCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  4. State v. BentonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  5. State v. DowdleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API