Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Bowler v. Vannoy

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1950No. 3598Published

1ConcurrenceBadt, J.

I concur reluctantly in the order granting the writ of mandamus (1) because I fear that the asserted inadequacy of legal remedies works both ways in this case; (2) because I am not convinced that the execution issued in Stella B. Leonard Belanger v. Belanger, Childers and Vrenon, following the form of the judgment in that case, ordering the immediate delivery of the livestock to the plaintiff is within the contemplation of the third-party claim statute (though no authorities pointing out the distinction have been presented) ; (3) because the granting of the writ of mandamus which in effect…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Sugarman v. LambNevada Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API