Legal Opinion
Eikenberry & Co. v. Edwards
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided March 5, 1887PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Appeal from Appanoose Distriot Court. Action upon a promissory note. There was a trial by jury, wbicli resulted in a verdict and judgment for the plaintiffs. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtRothrock, J.
I. The following is a copy of the note upon which this action is founded:
“Albta, Ia., July 18, 1878.
“Two years after date, for value received, we jointly and severally, as principals, promise to pay to the order of the Monroe County Bank twenty-five hundred dollars, with interest payable semi-annually, and if not paid when due, the note shall become due and collectable at once, and we also agree to pay reasonable attorney’s fee if this note is collected by suit. “T. S. Tharp & Co.
“D. M. Miller.
“Louis Miller.
“T. S. Tharp.
“Henry Miller.
“J. A. Edwards.”
The defendants T. S. Tharp & Co., and the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Eikenberry & Co. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tobin v. Western Mutual Aid SocietySupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
- State v. ShrevesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
- Crow v. CrowOregon Supreme Court · 1914
- Benbow v. James JohnsOregon Supreme Court · 1910
- Steinke v. HalvorsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.