Legal Opinion

Mays v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 4, 2006No. 3D06-1314PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ROTHENBERG, Judge.

The defendant, Clarence Mays (“Mays”), appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). As we find no merit to his claims, we affirm.

On September 25, 1990, based upon a negotiated plea, Mays pled guilty to one count of robbery with a deadly weapon and was sentenced to forty years incarceration with a fifteen-year minimum mandatory as a habitual violent felony offender (“HVFO”). In the motion which is the subject of the instant appeal, Mays argues that (1) his sentence is illegal as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  2. Tims v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  3. Hall v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  4. McCray v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wilbon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API