Legal Opinion

United States v. Mercantil Distribuidora, S. A.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 18, 1956No. 4837PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCole, Judge

This case involves the question of the meaning of the term “cured beef” as it is used in the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 51802, modifying paragraph 706 of the Tariff Act of 1930. Specifically, the question is whether the imported merchandise — beef strips and pieces treated with 4 to 4K per cent salt but not preserved sufficiently to eliminate the need for refrigeration — is “cured beef” so as to except it from the lower rates of duty provided for in the General Agreement.

Two protests are involved here, which were consolidated at the trial below. Although the merchandise…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. Florida Packing & Ice Co. v. CarneySupreme Court of Florida · 1906
  3. Mercantil Distribuidora, S. A. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bar Zel Expediters, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1982
  2. Bestfoods v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API