Legal Opinion

Clarence Anthony Dickenson v. Thomas Israel

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 11, 1981No. 80-1334PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a habeas proceeding in which the main issue is whether a state criminal defendant’s Fifth Amendment right to be free from double jeopardy was violated when a state appellate court vacated the defendant’s conviction of the charged offense but affirmed the implicit conviction of a lesser included offense. We hold that the Double Jeopardy Clause was not violated.

Petitioner-appellant Clarence Dickenson was tried and convicted for armed robbery in a Wisconsin state court. On appeal the Wisconsin Supreme Court, Dickenson v. State, 75 Wis.2d 47, 248 N.W.2d 447 (1977), held the evidence…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Hudson v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Dickenson v. IsraelDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1980
  4. United States v. David Wayne BurksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
  5. Dickenson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. DunnUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. MalufauHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Ex Parte EdwardsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  5. John Lee Shute v. State of Texas and Tommy ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API