Legal Opinion

In re Disqualification of Celebrezze

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 2001No. 2001-AP-039PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 94 Ohio St.3d 1228.] IN RE DISQUALIFICATION OF CELEBREZZE. CHOKEL v. CHOKEL. [Cite as In re Disqualification of Celebrezze,

2001-Ohio-4095.] Judges—Affidavit of disqualification—Absent extraordinary circumstances, judge will not be disqualified after having presided over lengthy proceedings in a pending case—Affiant was recently retained to represent plaintiff and should have been aware of prior disqualification orders. (No. 01-AP-039—Decided May 16, 2001.) ON AFFIDAVIT OF DISQUALIFICATION in Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kirkpatrick v. KirkpatrickOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Chokel v. ChokelOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. In re Disqualification of ValenOhio Supreme Court · 1991

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In re Disqualification of CapperOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. In re Disqualification of NicelyOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  3. In re Disqualification of LynchOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  4. In re Disqualification of McKayOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  5. State v. FoustOhio Supreme Court · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API