In re Disqualification of Celebrezze
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 94 Ohio St.3d 1228.] IN RE DISQUALIFICATION OF CELEBREZZE. CHOKEL v. CHOKEL. [Cite as In re Disqualification of Celebrezze,
2001-Ohio-4095.] Judges—Affidavit of disqualification—Absent extraordinary circumstances, judge will not be disqualified after having presided over lengthy proceedings in a pending case—Affiant was recently retained to represent plaintiff and should have been aware of prior disqualification orders. (No. 01-AP-039—Decided May 16, 2001.) ON AFFIDAVIT OF DISQUALIFICATION in Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kirkpatrick v. KirkpatrickOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Chokel v. ChokelOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- In re Disqualification of ValenOhio Supreme Court · 1991
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re Disqualification of CapperOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- In re Disqualification of NicelyOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- In re Disqualification of LynchOhio Supreme Court · 2013
- In re Disqualification of McKayOhio Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. FoustOhio Supreme Court · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.