Legal Opinion

N. M. Albert Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 5, 1967No. R.D. 11417PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wilson, Judge:

The following enumerated appeals for reap-praisement were consolidated for trial: R65/16410; B65/16428; *789E65/16421; E65/16422'; E65/17313; E65/15624; E65/17316; and E65/17318.

The imported merchandise consists of certain phonograph records which were manufactured and exported on and between August 30, 1961, and March 19, 1964, by ECA Victor Mexicana, S.A. de C.V. (hereinafter referred to ECAVM) of Mexico City, Mexico.

Counsel agree that the imported merchandise is not on the final list promulgated by the Secretary of the Treasury in 93 Treas. Dec. 14, T.D. 54521, and that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Berben Corp.United States Customs Court · 1962
  2. American Greiner Electronic, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  3. Fashion Ribbon Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  4. Berben Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
  5. United States v. Draeger Shipping Co.United States Customs Court · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. N. M. Albert Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  2. Control Data Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
  3. Control Data Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  4. Brown, Alcantar & Brown, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API