Legal Opinion

Comstock v. Purple

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1868PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Peoria county; the Hon. Sabijt D. Puterbaugh, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Breese

Appellees make the point, that John Comstock had no right to appeal; that he is not entitled to a hearing upon this record, and that the appeal should be dismissed. To understand this position, a brief history of the case is necessary.

A portion of the heirs at laxy of the late Norman H. Purple filed their petition in the circuit court of Peoria county, against the other heirs at law of the same,, and Ezra G. San-i ger and Nathaniel B. Curtis, his guardian, for the partition of a certain tract of land in Peoria county, the petitioners claiming that they, with two of the defendants, were,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tripp v. CookNew York Supreme Court · 1841
  2. Dunning v. DunningIllinois Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Williamson v. DaleNew York Court of Chancery · 1818
  4. Ayres v. BaumgartenIllinois Supreme Court · 1854

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Horney v. HayesIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Joseph Davis, Cory & Co. v. Chicago Dock Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1889
  3. George v. NorwoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  4. Quigley v. BreckenridgeIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Jennings v. DunphyIllinois Supreme Court · 1898

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API