Legal Opinion

Johnston v. Elmore

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1926No. 20154. Department TwoPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAskren, J.

Plaintiffs recovered judgment for damages sustained by reason of injuries inflicted when plaintiff Emma Johnston was struck by defendants’ automobile, and defendants appeal.

It is urged that there was insufficient evidence to justify the verdict. The evidence offered by respondent was, in its salient features, as follows: The respondent, Emma Johnston, seeking to cross Broadway in Seattle from the east to the west side, for the purpose of boarding a street car, went to the crosswalk at the curb. Looking north, or to her right, she saw the car which she wished to take about a block away.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sherrill v. Olympic Ice Cream Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jurisch v. Puget Transportation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Crowe v. O'RourkeWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Forsberg v. TevisWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Gayson v. DaughertyWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  5. McAbee v. FrenchWashington Supreme Court · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API