Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Gariano

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 23, 2006No. 1-03-2485Published

1DissentJustice Neville

I respectfully dissent because I do not believe that the Illinois eavesdropping statute authorizes police officers to use eavesdropping devices to intercept electronic communications without a court order. See 720 ILCS 5/14 — 1 et seq. (West 2000). The majority does not reach this issue in its opinion. Instead, the majority explains the reasons for its decision as follows:

“The General Assembly chose its terms and definitions. Here, an electronic communication is defined as a communication ‘where the sending and receiving parties intend the electronic communication to be private.’ (Emphasis…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Collins v. Board of Trustees of the Firemen's Annuity & Benefit FundIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  3. People v. WhitneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Antunes v. SookhakitchIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  5. In Re Application for Judgment & Sale of Delinquent PropertiesIllinois Supreme Court · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API