Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Healy
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided February 13, 2003PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSosman, J.
In 1981, the defendant was convicted of murder in the first degree. We affirmed the conviction and the denial of the defendant’s first motion for a new trial, and we denied his *673second motion for a new trial. Commonwealth v. Healy, 393 Mass. 367 (1984). The defendant has since filed a third motion for a new trial, based in part on the allegation that the prosecution withheld exculpatory and material evidence in violation of his Federal and State constitutional rights.1 See Commonwealth v. Gallarelli, 399 Mass. 17, 19 (1987), and cases cited. After an evidentiary hearing, the motion judge2…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Commonwealth v. GraceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- Commonwealth v. TucceriMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- Commonwealth v. WilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Healy v. SpencerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Commonwealth v. BlyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
- Commonwealth v. PhinneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
- Commonwealth v. DanielsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
- Commonwealth v. AyalaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.