Legal Opinion

Hudspeth v. Gugenheim

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 16, 1925No. 7530PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

S. Gugenheim and .associates own the land involved in this controversy. J. W. Hudspeth and his brother had been living upon and cultivating the land as tenants for a number of years, under rent contracts which ended with, and were renewed at, the beginning of each crop year up to and including the season of 1924-1925. Gug-enheim at first objected to entering into the contract with Hudspeth for the season of 1924-1925, but finally did so, with the admonition that, unless Hudspeth remedied the cause of Gugenheim’s objection, the latter would not renew the lease after that year. In July, 1925,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sumner v. CrawfordTexas Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Coombs v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  2. Barton v. TharpCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  3. Hudspeth v. GuggenheimCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  4. Pearce v. Atlantic Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  5. Corpus Christi Book & Stationery Co. v. Corpus Christi Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API