Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Warren

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1886PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the district court of the first district. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

Boreman, J:

This is an action of forcible entry and detainer, instituted before a justice of the peace, where judgment was rendered for the plaintiff, (appellant,) and thence the case was appealed by the defendant (respondent) to the district court. In the district court the alleged unlawful detainer was waived, no evidence being introduced in support of it. The hearing was before the court, a jury having been waived. The judgment being given for the defendant, the plaintiff appealed therefrom to this court.

The statute governing this class of cases is as follows: “Every person is guilty of a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wood v. . PhillipsNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  2. De Graw v. PriorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  3. Harrington v. ChambersUtah Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Shelby v. HoustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Thompson v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Buchanan v. CritesUtah Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Welling v. AbbottUtah Supreme Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API