Legal Opinion

Napier v. Combs

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 10, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge O’Neal —

Affirming.

This action was instituted December 16, 1915, by the appellants against the appellees, Thomas Combs, Eliza*775betli Napier Combs, his wife, and James B. Hoge, for the partition of a tract of land alleged to have been owned by T. Gr. Napier at his death and to have descended to appellants as his heirs at law.

In their petition they alleged that T. C. Napier, their ancestor, died intestate in March, 1901, survived by eleven children or their descendants; that at the time- of his death he was seized and possessed of a certain described tract of land…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Standifer v. CombsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  2. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. J. B. Corso & SonsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kerr v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  2. Lauderbach v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API