Legal Opinion
Brotherhood Co-op. Nat. Bank v. Hurlburt
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided August 8, 1927No. 8911PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BEAN, District Judge.
The motion to dismiss will be overruled. The suit is brought by various national banks, located in Portland, to enjoin the sheriff and tax collector of Multnomah county from collecting taxes assessed and levied on their shares of stock, for the reason that such taxes are in violation of the federal law. The defendant moved to dismiss on the ground (1) that it does not sufficiently appear from the complaint that the moneyed capital alleged to be owned by individual citizens or invested in tax-exempt notes and bonds comes into substantial competition with the plaintiffs in…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Norwood v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Mercantile Bank v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Des Moines National Bank v. FairweatherSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- First Nat. Bank of Guthrie Center v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Boise City Nat. Bank v. Ada CountyDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1930
- Brotherhood Co-Op. Nat. Bank v. HurlburtDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1928
- Sepulveda v. Talavera Cocina MexicanaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025