Legal Opinion

Daube v. Kuppenheimer

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 6, 1915No. Gen. No. 20,789PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Hosea W. Wells, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Fitch

The plaintiff, Joseph Daube, brought suit in the Municipal Court for $8,721.99, alleged to be due him from the firm of B. Kuppenheimer & Company for salary and commissions on the sale of merchandise for the defendants. There were two trials. Upon the first trial a verdict was returned in favor of the plaintiff for $6,221.91, which was set aside and a new trial granted. Thereupon the defendants paid into court the sum of $1,991.03, admitted by them to be due to the plaintiff, and filed an amended affidavit of merits as to the remainder of the plaintiff’s claim. A second trial was then had,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Howe v. HarrounIllinois Supreme Court · 1856
  2. Brown v. LawlerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1906
  3. Berry v. SavageIllinois Supreme Court · 1840
  4. McMechen v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1911
  5. Devine v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Colvin v. City of RoodhouseAppellate Court of Illinois · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API