Legal Opinion

Bonfiglio v. American Vehicle Insurance Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 9, 1996No. 96-1495PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

A PIP claimant seeks review of a circuit court, appellate division per curiam affir-mance of county court orders denying him attorney’s fees and costs and requiring arbitration. The merits of the appeal were for the circuit court to determine. We are convinced that its decision (either way) cannot be said to embody a “legal [error] serious enough to constitute a departure from the essential requirements of law,” Combs v. State, 436 So.2d 93, 95 (Fla.1983), so as to permit our review on certiorari and thus, in effect, grant the petitioner a forbidden second appeal. Haines City Community Dev.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Haines City Community Dev. v. HeggsSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  2. Combs v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  3. Rich v. FisherDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. LeroyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  2. Britt v. MascaraDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API