Legal Opinion

Baumgartner v. Burt

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 25, 1961No. 19640PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hall

The parties appear here in reverse order to their appearance in the trial court. We refer to the parties as they there appeared, Burts or plaintiffs, and Baumgartner or defendant.

Burts in their complaint allege that they sold insurance to Minerals Exploration Research Company, a partnership, and that Baumgartner was one of the partners; that the partnership and Baumgartner are indebted to Burts on an open account for unpaid premiums in the amount of $3,525.82 together with interest.

Baumgartner filed an answer in which he (1) denies that he was a general partner in Minerals Exploration…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Janvier & Co. v. FritzLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1938

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Marten v. StaabNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Cheney v. HaileyColorado Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Gunnison County v. Board of Assessment AppealsColorado Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Case v. Filmtrucks, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  5. Aurora Moving and Storage Co. v. KingSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API