Armstrong v. State

Eranktjm, Judge.

The purported bill of exceptions in this case recites the history of the case, including a statement that a motion for new trial was filed and amended and that the same came on for a hearing before the trial judge who after hearing argument overruled the motion and refused to grant a new trial. Following this recitation Armstrong designates himself as plaintiff in error and the State of Georgia as defendant in error, and he then specifies the portions of the record alleged to be material “to a clear understanding of the errors complained of.” Next, the bill of exceptions…