Legal Opinion

Michael Mcpherson v. Fishing Company Of Alaska

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 30, 2017No. 75059-3-IPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLeach, J.

¶1 Michael McPherson appeals the trial court’s summary judgment dismissal of his lawsuit against his former employer, Fishing Company of Alaska. McPherson claims that the “period of effectiveness” term in his employment contract prohibited Fishing Company from firing him without cause during that period. Because McPherson’s contract contained an at-will employment provision and the statute requiring a period of effectiveness does not change the historical rule of at-will employment in maritime contracts, we affirm.

FACTS

¶2 Michael McPherson signed an “Employment At-Will Contract” with Fishing…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Miles v. Apex Marine Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Isbrandtsen Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Owen v. Burlington Northern and Santa Fe RR Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Owen v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 2005

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Federal Home Loan Bank Of Seattle, App. v. Barclays Capital, Inc., Res.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API