Legal Opinion

Byrd v. Hampton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 29, 1956No. 90PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per OüRIAm.

There were, as stated, a number of interlocutory rulings made during the progress of the trial. However, no final judgment was entered from which an appeal could be prosecuted, and the court, in the exercise of its discretion, set the verdict aside. Roberts v. Hill, 240 N.C. 373, 82 S.E. 2d 373. Hence the record as it now appears before us contains no final judgment from which appeal will lie. In view of this condition of the record, it is necessary to vacate, without prejudice, all interlocutory rulings made during the progress of the trial, and to remand the cause for a trial de…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Roberts v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sizemore v. RaxterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Atkins v. DoubSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. House v. State Hospital InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API