Legal Opinion

P. Pastene & Co. v. First National Bank

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1918No. Civil No. 1575PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of tbe Superior Court of the county of Santa Cruz. "W. A. 0 ’Connor, Judge. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the CourtFranklin, C. J.

The appellant had a judgment for a large amount of money against M. James & Co., Successors, and Augustin Beraud and Emilio Beraud, which judgment *494remaining unsatisfied, a writ of garnishment was sued out, and on the tenth day of October, 1915, served upon the First National Bank of Nogales, the appellee, requiring it to answer under oath “what, if anything, it is indebted to the said M. James & Co., Successors, and Augustin Beraud and Emilio Beraud, and was when the writ was served upon it, and what effects, if any, of the said defendants it has in its possession, and had when the writ was…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hudson United Bank v. House of Supreme, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  2. Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API