Legal Opinion

Vanda Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Food and Drug Administration

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 31, 2020No. Civil Action No. 2019-0301Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA VANDA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil No. 19-301 (JDB) FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION In December 2018, the Food and Drug Administration placed a partial clinical hold on long-term human testing of the drug tradipitant. The hold was based on FDA’s conclusion that it could not properly assess the risks of long-term tradipitant use in humans until the drug’s sponsor, plaintiff Vanda Pharmaceuticals, Inc., conducted a long-term toxicity study on nonrodent animals. Vanda filed this…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Kisor v. WilkieSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  4. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. LTV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Shalala v. Guernsey Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API