Legal Opinion
Davidson v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 15, 1916PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Appeal from an order granting a motion to vacate an order for the examination of defendant.
1Per curiam
The order appealed from is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, upon the ground that the provisions of the Code* with reference to examinations do not apply to municipal corporations. (See Uvalde Asphalt Paving Co. v. City of New York, 149 App. Div. 494.) Present—Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Dowling, Page and Davis, JJ. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
See Code Civ. Proc. § 870 et seq.— [Rep.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Uvalde Asphalt Paving Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
3Cited by6 opinions
- Poynter v. County of Otter TailSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- City of New York v. VelmachosNew York Supreme Court · 1927
- Ely v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1953
- Hannon v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- Diamond v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.