Legal Opinion

Guenzberg v. Heyman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 28, 1958PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs of the appeal to the respondents. While the Trial Judge erroneously found that the plaintiff was an invitee, the evidence supports a judgment in plaintiff’s favor even though she was only a licensee. Defendant’s liability was established by his affirmative act in carelessly directing plaintiff to the powder room. Having undertaken to give a direction to a person unfamiliar with the surroundings, defendant was under a duty to give specific instructions, particularly in view of the physical arrangement of the premises and the many doors in the alcove…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Koval v. MarkleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. Rugieri v. BannisterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Christoforou v. LownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. KOVAL, CATHERINE v. MARKLEY, EDWINAAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API