Guenzberg v. Heyman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs of the appeal to the respondents. While the Trial Judge erroneously found that the plaintiff was an invitee, the evidence supports a judgment in plaintiff’s favor even though she was only a licensee. Defendant’s liability was established by his affirmative act in carelessly directing plaintiff to the powder room. Having undertaken to give a direction to a person unfamiliar with the surroundings, defendant was under a duty to give specific instructions, particularly in view of the physical arrangement of the premises and the many doors in the alcove…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Koval v. MarkleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Rugieri v. BannisterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Christoforou v. LownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- KOVAL, CATHERINE v. MARKLEY, EDWINAAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012