Raj Singh v. Kiran Rawat, et al.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAJ SINGH, No. 2:25-cv-2401-DC-CKD PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 KIRAN RAWAT, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff Raj Singh1 initiated this action on August 22, 2025, with a pro se complaint and a 19 motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (ECF Nos. 1, 2.) This matter is referred to the 20 undersigned magistrate judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). For 21 the reasons that follow, the undersigned recommends plaintiff’s application to…