Legal Opinion

Leith v. Horgan

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 18, 1953PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

24 N.J. Super. 516 (1953)

95 A.2d 15

WALTER M. LEITH AND HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

v.

ANDREW B. HORGAN, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued January 26, 1953.

Decided February 18, 1953.

Before Judges EASTWOOD, BIGELOW and JAYNE.

Mr. Edward Schoen, Jr., argued the cause for the appellants (Mr. Rodman C. Herman, on the brief).

Mr. Charles S. Barrett, Jr., argued the cause for the respondent (Messrs. Lum, Fairlie & Foster, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered by BIGELOW, J.A.D.

The complaint was dismissed by summary judgment in the Chancery…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Flannery v. SharpSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. Succession of ReissSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1894
  3. In Re OlcottNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
  4. Bush v. BushAppellate Court of Illinois · 1950

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Newburgh v. ArrigoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  2. Crook v. CrookArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Newburgh v. ArrigoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API