Legal Opinion

Standard Grate Bar Co. v. Defense Plant Corp.

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 23, 1944No. Civil Action No. 1245PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATSON, District Judge.

This is a motion by one of the defendants, the Esslinger-Misch Company, under the provisions of Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, for relief from a judgment taken against it by the plaintiff.

The summons was caused to be issued September 21, 1943. Service, of same was duly made upon the Esslinger-Misch Company (hereinafter called the defendant) September 23, 1943. No appearance was entered for the defendant and no answer was filed. On November 19, 1943, thirty seven days after the defendant was required to answer had…

2Cited by20 opinions

  1. Tozer v. Charles A. Krause Milling Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
  2. United Coin Meter Company, Inc., a Michigan Corporation v. Seaboard Coastline Railroad, a Virginia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  3. Arthur J. Rooks v. American Brass Company, a Connecticut CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
  4. Dalminter, Inc. v. Jessie Edwards, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1961
  5. Trueblood v. Grayson Shops of Tennessee, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1963

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API