Legal Opinion
Veltmans v. Kurtz
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided November 3, 1911No. Docket No. 90PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Error to Eaton; Smith, J. Assumpsit by William Veltmans and Margaretha Veltmans against Benjamin Kurtz and Ella Kurtz for breach of the covenant of seisin in a certain deed of conveyance. A judgment for defendants on a verdict directed by the court is reviewed by plaintiffs on writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
October 6, 1906, plaintiffs purchased from defendants certain land. The description was as follows:
“All that certain piece or parcel of land situate and being in the township of Delta, county of Eaton and State of Michigan, and described as follows, to wit: The west half of the northeast quarter of section thirty in town four north of range three west, together with all and singular the hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging, or in anywise appertaining.”
It will be noticed that no reference is made to any plat or government survey, and the number of acres is not stated.
Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Sneed v. OsbornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Young v. BlakemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- People v. OlmsteadMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
- Smith v. HamiltonMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
- Stewart v. CarletonMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Johnson v. TrumpSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913