Legal Opinion

Needham v. Bickford

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided April 28, 1936No. Nos. 3069, 3070PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORTON, Circuit Judge.

These are cross-appeals from a decree of the District Court allowing in the sum of $647,000 the claim of the United Investment Assurance Trust represented by its receiver, Mr. Bickford, against the Founders Securities Trust represented by its receiver, Mr. Needham, but postponing payment thereof until the claims of all ordinary creditors of Founders Trust shall have been paid. The receiver of the Founders Trust has appealed from the allowance of the claim, and the receiver of the United Trust from the postponement of it. The complicated facts are stated in an excellent…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Minneapolis Civic & Commerce Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Manufacturers' Finance Co. v. McKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. In Re Bowman Hardware & Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1933
  4. Centmont Corporation v. MarschCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1933
  5. In Re Kentucky Wagon Mfg. Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. New York Stock Exchange v. PICKARD & COMPANY, INCORPORATEDCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1972
  2. In Re Chas. K. Horton, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API