Legal Opinion

Winston v. Moseley

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 15, 1864PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Petition for Mandamus.

1Opinion of the CourtBates, Judge

This is a petition for a mandamus. Winston was, prior to December, 1863, Commissioner of the permanent seat of Government. In December, 1863, the General Assembly elected another person commissioner, who received a commission as such. Winston claims that he is still lawfully in office, and presented to the auditor an account for a quarter’s salary, which the auditor refused to allow. Winston asks of this court a writ of mandamus, commanding the auditor to audit and allow the account.

The application for. a mandamus is refused. It is no part of the duty of the auditor to determine the right to…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Gallagher v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  2. State ex rel. Vail v. DraperSupreme Court of Missouri · 1871
  3. State ex rel. Tracy v. TaaffeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1887
  4. State ex rel. Buttz v. Comptroller GeneralSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1878
  5. State ex rel. Frank v. GobenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API