Legal Opinion

Coffman v. Wilson

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 20, 1859PublishedCited by 12 opinions

CASE 49 — PETITION ORDINARY — APTEAL FROM HARRISON CIRCUIT COURT. cited Civil Code, secs. 363, 364, 365, 366.

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE DUVALL

delivered the opinion of the court:

This was an action on a note executed by Coffman as principal, and by Redmon and January as his sureties.

The two latter filed an answer, setting up the following defense: That when Coffman applied to them to sign said note as his sureties, they agreed to do so, upon the condition that William Redmon and John Redmon, or two other solvent persons in their stead, would also sign it, and upon no other condition whatever; and upon this agreement they signed the note; and the plaintiffs had full notice of the terms upon which these defendants signed…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Loving v. Warren CountyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1878
  2. Baker v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  3. Mitchell v. Altus State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Miles v. United Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  5. Bivins v. HelsleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1862

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API