Shaw v. Classification Review Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Palladino,
The Office of Budget and Administration (Respondent) seeks to quash the appeal of Hortenee Shaw and Raymond Morgan (Petitioners). Petitioners are appealing a letter from the Director of the Bureau of Personnel (Director), which informed them that their job classification is proper. For the reasons set forth below we are granting the Respondent’s Motion to Quash.
Petitioners are employed by the Department of Public Welfare and are each classified as Region Children and Youth Representative I. They requested a reclassification to Region Children and Youth Representative…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Amesbury v. Luzerne County Institution DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Sergi v. School District of PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Dingel v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- School District v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
3Cited by1 opinion
- Orage v. Commonwealth, Office of AdministrationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984