Legal Opinion

Florida Bar v. Scott

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 5, 1967No. 35928PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DREW, Justice.

The respondent in this case was charged by The Florida Bar with having been guilty of the violation of Canons 27 and 28 of the Canons of Professional Ethics and Rule 19 of the Additional Rules Governing the Conduct of Attorneys in Florida, 31 F.S.A. in that he did, on February 6, 1964, in Putnam County, Florida, individually and through his agent, Walter M. Limbric, who was acting within the scope of his agency, actively solicit professional employment from Mrs. Ernest Lee Kaymore, Mrs. Obediah Mc-Caskell, Mrs. Richard Junior Hodges, Mrs. W. A. Johnson and Mrs. Aaron Woods to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Florida Bar v. MurrellSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  2. State Ex Rel. Florida Bar v. DawsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
  3. Smith v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  4. State Ex Rel. Florida Bar v. RubinSupreme Court of Florida · 1962
  5. State ex rel. Florida Bar v. GravesSupreme Court of Florida · 1963

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re StiversIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
  2. The Florida Bar v. RubinSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  3. The Florida Bar v. AbramsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1967
  4. The Florida Bar v. MasonSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  5. The Florida Bar v. StaffordSupreme Court of Florida · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API