Legal Opinion

Privilege Underwriters Reciprocal Exchange v. Grayson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 16, 2016No. 1150927PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BOLIN, Justice.

Privilege Underwriters Reciprocal Exchange (“PURE”), a Florida domiciled insurance exchange, obtained a judgment, entered upon a jury verdict, declaring that Peter Grayson was not entitled to coverage under the uninsured-motorist (“UM”) portion of an automobile insurance policy under which Grayson’s sister, Alice Gray-son, was a named insured. The Mobile Circuit Court granted Grayson’s motion to set aside that judgment on the basis that it was void for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. PURE now appeals. We reverse and remand.

Facts and Procedural History

On October 1,2012,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State v. Property at 2018 Rainbow DriveSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  2. Stamps v. Jefferson County Bd. of Educ.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  3. Ex Parte Full Circle Distribution, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  4. Town of Warrior v. BlaylockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  5. Copeland v. Jefferson CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1969

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Great American Alliance Company v. Bravo Food Service LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API