Privilege Underwriters Reciprocal Exchange v. Grayson
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
BOLIN, Justice.
Privilege Underwriters Reciprocal Exchange (“PURE”), a Florida domiciled insurance exchange, obtained a judgment, entered upon a jury verdict, declaring that Peter Grayson was not entitled to coverage under the uninsured-motorist (“UM”) portion of an automobile insurance policy under which Grayson’s sister, Alice Gray-son, was a named insured. The Mobile Circuit Court granted Grayson’s motion to set aside that judgment on the basis that it was void for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. PURE now appeals. We reverse and remand.
Facts and Procedural History
On October 1,2012,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- State v. Property at 2018 Rainbow DriveSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Stamps v. Jefferson County Bd. of Educ.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1994
- Ex Parte Full Circle Distribution, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Town of Warrior v. BlaylockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
- Copeland v. Jefferson CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Great American Alliance Company v. Bravo Food Service LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2019