Schmidt v. Levi Strauss & Co.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE JURY DEMAND FOR SARBANES-OXLEY CLAIM
RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge.
Defendants Levi Strauss & Co. (“Levi”) and Laura Liang (“Liang”) move to strike plaintiffs Robert Schmidt’s (“Schmidt”) and Thomas Walsh’s (“Walsh”) demand for a jury trial as to plaintiffs’ claim pursuant to section 806 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, codified at 18 U.S.C. § 1514A. Defendants argue that there is no right to a jury trial conferred by either § 1514A or the Seventh Amendment of the United States Constitution. Plaintiffs oppose the motion. The court has read the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Davis v. Michigan Department of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brinker v. Axos BankDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022
- Comcast Corporation v. United States Department Of LaborDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2025
- Edwards v. First Trust Portfolios LPDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2025