Legal Opinion · Dissent

Allhusen v. Caristo Construction Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 22, 1951Published

1DissentVan Voorhis, J.

The decisions by this court and by the Appellate Term in Sachs v. Neptune Meter Co. (238 App. Div. 82) upheld the assign-ability of the money due and payable under the contract there involved. What was said in the opinion in that case upon the point now at issue, as well as in the prevailing and concurring opinions at the Appellate Term (144 Misc. 70), although most carefully considered, was obiter dicta. The same is true of the statements in the opinion in State Bank v. Central Mercantile Bank (248 N. Y. 428, 434-435), per Pound, J., which accord more nearly with the opinion by Justice…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Bank v. Central Mercantile BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Sacks v. Neptune Meter Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1932
  3. Sacks v. Neptune Meter Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  4. Snyder v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  5. Bank of United States v. Public BankNew York Supreme Court · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API