Legal Opinion

Doxtader v. Sivertsen

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 22, 1990No. Docket 117211PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

i

Plaintiff brought an action against defendant, his landlord, alleging negligent maintenance of the apartment building where plaintiff lived.

Plaintiff retained John D. Tallman as his attorney and entered into a contingency agreement with Tallman, agreeing to pay him one-third of the amount recovered in the action against defendant.

A default judgment was entered against defendant due to his failure to plead or otherwise defend. The default judgment ordered defendant to pay plaintiff $25,000.

Without plaintiff’s attorney’s knowledge or consent, plaintiff and defendant thereafter allegedly agreed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railroad v. Cheboygan Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Miller v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Warner v. TarverMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bennett v. WeitzMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Laborers Pension Trust Fund-Detroit & Vicinity v. Interior Exterior Specialists Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011
  3. Candise Hooker v. Wanigas Credit UnionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
  4. David E Christensen Pllc v. Pioneer State Mutual Insurance CoMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. David E Christensen Pllc v. Pioneer State Mutual Insurance CoMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API