Legal Opinion

Clark v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1923Published

1Opinion of the Court

H. T. Kellogg, J.:

The plaintiff was injured by a fall in the course of his employment. His employer, the defendant, had failed to secure compensation for his injured employees, as required by the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Consequently, the plaintiff, exercising the option made available by that law (§ 11), brought this action to recover damages for the injuries he received. ■ The sole issue in the action was the negligence of the defendant. (Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 11.) Upon this issue the jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendant. The verdict was set aside by the trial…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Perry v. . RogersNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. La Marca v. Atlantic Stevedoring Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API