Mackintosh v. Gibbs
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 50 Vroom 40.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Pitney, Chancellor.
This action was brought against the indorsers of a promissory note, made in the State of California and payable there, and indorsed for value before maturity to the plaintiff’s testatrix in the State of New Jersey. The facts are sufficiently set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court. We concur with that court in the view that the question of the liability of the defendants upon the note de*579pends upon the effect that the law attributes to their act, and that such effect is to be determined by the law of the State of Hew Jersey,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Chicago Railway Equipment Co. v. Merchants' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
3Cited by9 opinions
- Des Moines Savings Bank v. ArthurSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Alcoa Edgewater No. 1 Fed. Credit Union v. CarrollSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Home Credit Co. v. PrestonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Warner-Lambert Pharmaceutical Co. v. William SylkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Guaranty Trust Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.