Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Container Stevedoring Company v. Director, Office of Workers Compensation Programs Albert Gross

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 12, 1991No. 90-70311Published

1ConcurrenceO’Scannlain, Circuit Judge

Under the applicable regulations, a request for special fund relief should be made “as soon as the permanency of the claimant’s condition becomes known or is an issue in dispute.” 20 C.F.R. § 702.321(b). The court today concludes that permanency is either “known” or “in dispute” whenever it is mentioned in a compensation-related document, however tangential to the actual course of proceedings such reference may be. This harsh rule does not comport with the relevant statutory or regulatory language, nor is it supported by the policies underlying the LHWCA or by common sense. Accordingly, I…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Todd Pacific Shipyards Corporation Aetna Casualty and Surety Company v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs Annie MayesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. Cornell University v. VelezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API