Legal Opinion

United States v. Linder

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided September 2, 2010No. CR 10-30033-RALPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE

ROBERTO A. LANGE, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 28) issued by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Moreno, which recommends that this Court grant in part and deny in part Defendant Justin Linder’s motion to suppress evi denee. (Doc. 14). Linder filed a statement of objections (Doc. 34) to the findings and factual determinations made in the Report and Recommendation, as allowed by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

In considering a magistrate judge’s…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. ThomasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API