Legal Opinion

United States v. Edward Mickael Rytman

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 20, 1973No. 72-3366PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Rytman was convicted of a misdemeanor violation of 18 U.S.C. § 641, having been found guilty of knowingly retaining an air-conditioner compressor stolen from the United States Government.

The sole issue on appeal is whether or not the search warrant described the item with the particularity necessary to withstand the strictures of the Fourth Amendment.

The item was described in the search warrant as a Bendix-Westinghouse motor compressor CH490TA-9-2085, Serial #AA00-2002, located in an air conditioning unit at appellant’s home. In actuality the stolen part was a Bendix- Westinghouse motor…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Theodore Ray MelanconCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  2. United States v. Robert Bolivar DepughCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. James A. Harvey, A/K/A Ray Stewart, A/K/A Joseph R. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  2. Stevens v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  3. State v. TamerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  4. State of Iowa v. Thomas Dean JesseCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API