Legal Opinion

Usry v. Farr

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 1, 2001No. S01A0784PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fletcher, Chief Justice.

At issue in this appeal is when title to the remainder interest under the will of Watson Usry vested. On summary judgment, the trial court held that the remainder vested at the time of Usry’s death and not at the death of the life tenant. Because Usry’s will expressed the intention of providing for those who survive him and all five grandchildren survived him, we affirm.

Watson Usry died in 1967. The relevant clause of Usry’s will provided successive life estates in his lands, first to his wife Lucille and then to their children, with the remainder to his grandchildren.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Crawley v. KendrickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Britt v. FincherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  3. Young v. YoungSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  4. Miller v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
  5. Witcher v. WitcherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Folsom v. RowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
  2. Kale v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
  3. Wilkes v. FraserCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  4. James David Wilkes v. Nell Wilkes FraserCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  5. Usry v. FarrSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API