Legal Opinion

Mollett v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided April 30, 1997No. F-95-214Published

1Opinion of the Court

939 P.2d 1 (1997)

Lloyd Edward MOLLETT, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. F-95-214.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

April 30, 1997.

Rehearing Denied June 23, 1997.

Debbie Mattox, Oklahoma Indigent Defense, Robert G. Perrine, Norman, for Defendant at trial.

Beth Pauchnik, Laura Austin Thomas, Assistant District Attorneys, Stillwater, for the State at trial.

W.A. Drew Edmondson, Attorney General, William L. Humes, Assistant Attorney General, Oklahoma City, for Appellee on appeal.

Cindy G. Brown, James A. Drummond, Appellate Defense Counsel, Norman, for Appellant on appeal.

OPINION

JOHNSON…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Chapel; Concurrence · Lumpkin; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Steagald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Spuehler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1985

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API