Legal Opinion

Ogden v. Wolff

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided September 8, 1975No. Nos. 75-1042, 75-1083PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENSON, Circuit Judge.

The sole issue in these consolidated state habeas appeals, brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, is whether the non-disclosure to petitioners’ attorney of the written record of the polygraph examination and pre-test interview conducted upon the prosecutrix in petitioners’ trials for statutory rape resulted in a denial of fundamental fairness at those trials. We find that it did not. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s1 denial of a writ of habeas corpus to petitioner Og*818den and reverse the granting of the writ to petitioner Atkinson.

Petitioners were charged with the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Moore v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. United States v. James Vincent KeoghCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  4. United States v. Irving B. Kahn and Teleprompter CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  5. United States v. James MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. United States v. Leonard Crow DogCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  2. State v. ReutterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Richard Bernard Lindhorst, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  4. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1998
  5. People v. HedrickSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API