Legal Opinion

Donaldson v. Bottar

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 29, 2000No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied that part of plaintiffs motion seeking partial summary judgment on the legal malpractice cause of action. Plaintiff failed to submit evidence in admissible form establishing that, but for defendants’ negligence, she would have been successful in the underlying action (see, Campcore, Inc. v Mathews, 261 AD2d 870, 871, lv *898denied 93 NY2d 814, rearg denied 94 NY2d 839). Specifically, plaintiff failed to establish as a matter of law that the bus accident was the proximate cause of her herniated disc for which she…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Foley v. RocheAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  2. Egan v. A.J. Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Schindler v. Issler & Schrage, P. C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. Wiggin v. GordonCivil Court of the City of New York · 1982
  5. Campcore, Inc. v. MathewsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pellegrino v. FileAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Ray v. WatnickDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  3. Bryant v. SilvermanDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  4. DUSZYNSKI, ANN v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANYAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  5. Donaldson v. BottarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API