Legal Opinion

United States v. Frazer

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 15, 1879PublishedCited by 7 opinions

At law.

1Opinion of the Court

CHOATE, District Judge.

These were two actions to recover balances of duties alleged to be due upon goods imported by the defendant [James Frazer] by virtue of an alleged re-liquidation of the duties by the collector. The collector having, upon the report of the appraiser, liquidated the duty, the goods were delivered to the defendant and the duty thus ascertained was paid, not even samples of the goods remaining in the possession of the collector. Afterwards another appraiser, who had never seen the goods nor samples of them, made another report, classifying the goods differently, whereby, if…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Cherry Hill Textiles, Inc., and International Cargo and Surety Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  2. United States v. DohertyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1886
  3. Vitelli v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  4. Constance v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
  5. Cassel v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API