Legal Opinion
Gustafson v. Bi-State Dev. Agency Of Mo-Il
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided January 29, 2019No. 4:18-CV-2074 CASPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
CHARLES A. SHAW, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
This matter is before the Court on plaintiff Scott Gustafson's ("plaintiff") motion to remand pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). Defendant Bi-State Development Agency of the Missouri-Illinois Metropolitan District ("defendant") opposes the motion to remand and it is fully briefed. For the following reasons, the motion will be denied in all respects.
I. Background
Plaintiff, a visually impaired resident of Missouri, initiated this action in the Circuit Court for the City of St. Louis on December 23, 2015. Plaintiff sought injunctive relief and monetary…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- James R. Sullivan v. James P. Conway and International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- PR Group, LLC v. Windmill International, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- David Cevallos v. George SilvaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
- Wright v. LuptonDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Berry v. St. Louis Public SchoolsDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2023